Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2003 Apr 15;9(4):851–857. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.851

Table 2.

The ultrastructures of epithelial nuclei of gastric mucosa in CG and GC n (%)

Group	n	Appearce		Chromatin		Nucleons
Group	n	Nucleoplasmic ratio > 1	Nucleus lobulated	Margination or homogeneity	Perinuclcar concentrated	Hypertrophy or margination	looping
NC	15			1 (6.7)	1 (6.7)
CSG	68	5 (5.7)	2 (2.9)	7 (10.3)	5 (7.4)	2 (2.9)	2 ( 2.9)
CAG	64	20 (1.3)^d	19 (9.7)^d	33 (51.6)^bd	29 (45.3)^bd	27 (42.2)^d	14 (21.9)
CA	36	36 (00.0)^bf	36 (00.0)^bf	17 (47.2)^d	26 (72.2)^bdf	18 (50.0)^d	17 (47.2)^df
IMII_b	8	8 (100.0)^b	5 (62.5) ^h	5 (62.5)^b	6 (75.0)^b	4 (50.0)	3 (37.5)
ATP⁺⁺	13	8 (61.5)^h ⁱ	5 (38.5)^h ^j	4 (30.8)^bgj	3 (23.1)^bhj	5 (38.5)	1 (7.7)^h ^j
IM⁺⁺ + ATP⁺⁺	9	7 (77.8)^h ^h ⁱ ^k	5 (55.5)^h ^k	3 (33.3)^bgj	3 (33.3)^bhj	4 (44.4)	3 (33.3)^l
IM⁺⁺⁺ + ATP⁺⁺	8	8 (100.0)^l ⁿ	8 (100.0)^j ^k ^m	5 (62.5)^bkm	6 (75.0)^blm	5 (62.5) ^l ^m	3 (37.5)^l

Compared with CA group, ^gP < 0.05,

^h

P < 0.01, Compared with IMII_b group,

ⁱ

P < 0.05,

^j

P < 0.01, Compared with ATP⁺⁺ group,

^k

P < 0.05,

^l

P < 0.01. Compared with IM⁺⁺ + ATP⁺⁺ group,

^m

P < 0.05,

ⁿ

P < 0.01. In table 3-6, the marks are the same as here.