Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 24;9(11):2465–2476. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.57

Table 1. Differences in gene family profiles of conventional and AA classes attributable to soil layer and harvesting treatments.

  Conventional classes
Auxiliary activities
  F or t R2 F or t R2
All samples
 Layer 21.982* 0.76 22.51* 0.75
 Harvesting treatment 6.87*** 0.17 5.54*** 0.17
 Residuals   0.07   0.08
         
Mineral layer
Harvesting treatment 3.63** 0.58 1.24 NS
OM0 vs OM1 2.26*      
OM0 vs OM2 2.86*      
OM0 vs OM3 2.02*      
OM1 vs OM2 2.23*      
OM1 vs OM3 1.25      
OM2 vs OM3 0.91      
         
Organic layer
Harvesting treatment 11.85** 0.80 10.98** 0.79
OM0 vs OM1 4.82*   4.92**  
OM0 vs OM2 2.22*   2.21*  
OM1 vs OM2 3.09*   2.50*  

Abbreviations: AA, auxiliary activity; NS, not significant; OM, organic matter.

Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on Bray–Curtis distances. Multivariate dispersion was significantly different (P<0.05) when analyzing all samples together but nonsignificant when each soil layer was analyzed separately. Global test results yielded pseudo-F values, whereas pairwise comparisons yielded t-values (italicized). P-values are based on permutation for the general tests, and on Monte Carlo permutation for pairwise tests. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.