Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 28;13(36):4891–4896. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i36.4891

Table 2.

Comparative analysis of lesion detection for 133 lesions in 59 patients using pre-contrast, ferucarbotran-enhanced, and Gd-DTPA-enhanced sequences

Sequence n (%)
< 1 cm 1-3 cm > 3 cm
(n = 44 ) (n = 68) (n = 21 )
1 Pre-contrast T1WI GRE 15 (34.1)b 48 (70.6)b 21 (100.0)
2 Pre-contrast FSE T2WI with fat suppression 24 (54.5)b 61 (89.7) 21 (100.0)
3 Dynamic Gd-DTPA- enhanced T1WI GRE 35 (79.5)a 67 (98.5) 21 (100.0)
4 Dynamic ferucarbotran- enhanced T1WI GRE 32 (72.7) 62 (91.2) 21 (100.0)
5 Delayed ferucarbotran-enhanced FSE T2WI with fat suppression 41 (93.2) 68 (100) 21 (100.0)
6 Delayed ferucarbotran- enhanced GRE T2*WI 39 (88.6) 67 (98.5) 21 (100.0)
a

P < 0.05,

b

P < 0.01, vs (5), (6).