Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014 Feb 17;16(21):10112–10128. doi: 10.1039/c3cp54724h

Table 2.

Deviations of computed vibrational frequencies (cm−1) of all nucleobases with respect to experimental dataa and B3LYP results.

Calculated vs Experimentala Calculated vs B3LYP

Δanharmf Δharme Δanharmf ΔGVPT2g
MAEb

B3LYP 11.1
B3LYP-D3 11.4 1.4 1.7 1.5
B3LYP-DCP 22.6 21.6 26.4 6.1

MINc

B3LYP −38
B3LYP-D3 −41 −14 −17 −19
B3LYP-DCP −80 −103 −102 −23

MAXd

B3LYP 27
B3LYP-D3 28 15 18 20
B3LYP-DCP 72 82 75 52
a

From Ref. 31,32,34-36,39,145,147,157,158.

b

Weighted Mean Absolute Error.

c

Minimum negative deviation.

d

Maximum positive deviation.

e

Deviation between harmonic frequencies.

f

Deviation between anharmonic frequencies.

g

Deviation of anharmonic shift for the selected method respect to B3LYP method.