Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 4;23(11):1581–1583. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.28

Table 1. Analysed SNPs in genomic areas encompassing HGF and LOX and results of their association testing with keratoconus in Czech cases of European descendent.

    Allelic test Dominant model Recessive model
SNP Minor allele MAF cases MAF controls OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value
rs1800449:C>T T 0.133 0.176 0.72 0.47–1.10 0.12 0.69 0.43–1.14 0.16 0.58 0.09–2.76 0.52
rs2288393:C>G G 0.118 0.166 0.67 0.43–1.06 0.087 0.63 0.38–1.05 0.07 0.69 0.11–3.64 0.73
rs2956540:G>C C 0.318 0.402 0.69 0.50–0.96 0.024 0.55 0.35–0.87 0.0069 0.78 0.39–1.56 0.52
rs10519694:C>T T 0.200 0.233 0.82 0.56–1.19 0.32 0.70 0.45–1.10 0.13 1.59 0.47–5.67 0.43
rs1014091:G>A A 0.152 0.143 1.08 0.69–1.66 0.75 1.08 0.66–1.76 0.81 1.17 0.21–6.41 1
rs17501108:G>T T 0.149 0.145 1.03 0.66–1.59 0.92 1.04 0.64–1.71 0.90 0.93 0.18–4.42 1
rs3735520:G>A A 0.458 0.368 1.45 1.06–1.98 0.018 1.48 0.94–2.36 0.097 1.86 1.03–3.37 0.036

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

The effect sizes are reported with reference to the minor allele. The P-values are rounded up to the second non-zero decimal and are in bold wherever significant (<0.05). Alleles are shown aligned to the forward strand.