Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;137(31):9784–9787. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b05447

Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Parametersa.

graphic file with name ja-2015-05447c_0003.jpg

entry Cu ligand % yield (% conversion)b
1 CuSO4 L1 79 (99)
2 CuSO4 L2 81 (99)
3 CuSO4 L3 66 (99)
4 CuSO4 L4 17 (91)
5 CuSO4 5 (30)
6 CuCl2·2H2O L2 78 (99)
7 CuBr2 L2 79 (99)
8 Cu(OAc)2 L2 78 (99)
9 L2 0 (22)c
10d CuSO4 L2 44 (72)
11e CuSO4 L2 7 (30)
12f CuSO4 L2 NR
13g CuSO4 L2 5 (99)
14h CuSO4 L2 4 (99)
15i CuSO4 L2 NR

graphic file with name ja-2015-05447c_0004.jpg

a

See the Supporting Information for details. Amino acids are shown in a one-letter code. NR = no reaction.

b

Yields were determined by integration of the total ion currents (TICs) from LC–MS analyses of the unpurified reaction mixtures.

c

Elimination and diselenide were the only observable products.

d

0.5 mM CuSO4, 0.5 mM L2, and 0.5 mM boronic acid were used.

e

0.25 mM CuSO4, 0.25 mM L2, and 0.25 mM boronic acid were used.

f

The Sec-TNP residue replaced with Ser.

g

The Sec-TNP residue was replaced with Cys.

h

The Sec-TNP residue was replaced with Cys-TNP.

i

The Sec-TNP residue was replaced with Met.