Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;43(11):1823–1837. doi: 10.1124/dmd.115.065920

Table 4.

PBPK models published for P450 inducers

Enzyme Induced Compound Application Minimal or Full IV or Oral Clearancea Simulated genotype specified? Population matched?b Verificationc Acceptance Criteriad Software Citation
CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 Efavirenz DDI Minimal Oral In vitro Yes N.S A, E 1 Simcyp (Siccardi et al., 2013)
Efavirenz Absorption Full Oral In vitro No N.S. B 5 Matlab (Rajoli et al., 2014)
Efavirenz DDI Full Oral In vitro Yes Sex D, E 1 Simcyp (Rekic et al., 2011)
CYP3A4 Carbamazepine DDI Full Oral In vitro No N.S. B, E 5 WinNonlin (Guo et al., 2013)
Etravirine Absorption Full Oral In vitro No N.S. B 5 Matlab (Rajoli et al., 2014)
Rifampin DDI Full Oral BC No N.S. E 5 Gastroplus (Baneyx et al., 2014)
Rifampin DDI Full Oral In vivo No N.S. B, E 5 WinNonlin (Guo et al., 2013)
Rifampin DDI Full Oral BC No Age, sex, PGX A 1 Simcyp (Neuhoff et al., 2013b)
a

BC = back calculated from in vivo data.

b

PGX = genotype, N.S. = not specified.

c

Data sets used in model verification included: (A) Single dose PK, (B) alternative dosing regimen, (C) alternative formulation, (D) alternative population, (E) DDI.

d

Acceptance criteria fell into 5 categories: (1) Not specified, (2) Ratio of PK parameter(s) must be within 30% of observed ratio, (3) Ratio of PK parameter(s) must be within 2 fold of observed ratio, (4) PK parameters must be within 30% of observed parameters, (5) PK parameters must be within 2 fold of observed parameters.