Table 2.

Performance comparison with published detection methods

Method	Total, beats	TP, beats	FN, beats	FP, beats	Se, %	+P, %
LC [2]	109,428	108,212	1216	651	98.89	99.40
IFPTA [3]	109,494	109,032	495	462	99.58	99.55
SDD [4]	109,452	109,314	127	138	99.87	99.88
DFOID [5]	107,632	107,476	153	156	99.86	99.86
3M [6]	109,510	109,297	204	213	99.81	99.81
BPF + SEE + HT [7]	109,496	109,417	140	79	99.93	99.87
EMD + SBA [8]	105,241	104,997	467	244	99.77	99.56
EMD + SBA [9]	109,495	109,275	194	220	99.80	99.82
WT [10]	104,182	104,070	65	112	99.89	99.94
WT + SBA [11]	109,428	109,208	153	220	99.80	99.86
BPF + HT [13]	109,456	108,499	758	957	99.13	99.31
BPF + HT + SBA [13]	109,456	108,681	836	775	99.29	99.24
BPF + SBA [13]	109,456	109,102	405	354	99.68	99.63
BPF + SBA [13]	109,456	108,989	447	467	99.57	99.59
BPF + DF [13]	109,456	107,344	884	2112	98.07	99.18
proposed method	109,496	109,402	94	86	99.91	99.92