Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 8;3:e1300. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1300

Table 3. Serial mediation analysis to identify direct and indirect effects between extraversion and happiness.

95% CI
Effect Path Coefficient SE LL UL
Direct effect of E on QSR a 1 1.0828*** .1848 .7202 1.4454
Direct effect of E on ERA a 2 .0036 .0032 −.0028 .0099
Direct effect of QSR on ERA a 3 .0022*** .0005 .0011 .0033
Direct effect of QSR on H b 1 .0467*** .0071 .0327 .0606
Direct effect of ERA on H b 2 1.9333*** .4107 1.1273 2.7393
Total effect of E on H, without accounting for QSR and ERA c .4185*** .0426 .3348 .5021
Direct effect of E on H when accounting for QSR and ERA c .3564*** .0419 .2743 .4386
Total indirect effect ab .0620 .0149 .0353 .0946
Indirect via QSR a 1 b 1 .0505 .0136 .0272 .0810
Indirect via QSR and ERA a 1 a 3 b 2 .0046 .0018 .0019 .0096
Indirect via ERA a 2 b 2 .0069 .0069 −.0054 .0224
Happiness total effect modela (R2 = .25***)

Notes.

Coefficient
nonstandardized B coefficients
SE
standard errors
CI
bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval
LL
lower limit
UL
upper limit
E
extraversion
H
happiness
QSR
quality of social relationship
ERA
emotion regulation ability; 10,000 bootstrap samples
a

Age, sex, and neuroticism were covaried.

***

p < .001.

N = 1,006.