Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 15;6(3):161–172. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1039223

Table 3.

Comparison of bacterial genera significantly (P<0.05) over or under represented in tumor adjacent tissues from the US and Spain. Numbers represent the relative abundance (%) ± standard deviation. Shaded cells indicate higher relative abundance.

Phyla Genera US Spain P-value
Actinobacteria Propionibacterium 0.1±0.2 0.02±0.09 0.0452
  f_Coriobacteriaceae 0.02±0.07 0.09±0.19 0.0096
  Bifidobacterium 0.0±0.0 0.03±0.14 0.0059
  Collinsella 0.1±0.1 1.27±1.83 0.0001
  Slackia 0.008±0.02 0.05±0.13 0.0426
Bacteroidetes Bacteroides 39.9±21.4 27.1±17.6 0.0469
  Butyricimonas 0.06±0.15 0.16±0.25 0.0054
  f_[Barnesiellaceae] 0.38±0.72 1.39±2.46 0.0075
  Paraprevotella 0.07±0.31 0.17±0.35 0.0411
  f_Rikenellaceae 0.37±0.61 1.30±1.96 0.0215
Firmicutes Selenomonas 0.6±1.9 0.0±0.0 0.0037
  Geobacillus 0.3±0.6 0.0±0.0 0.0008
  Schwartzia 0.3±1.0 0.0±0.0 0.0067
  Bulleidia 0.5±0.8 0.1±0.2 0.0224
  Lachnospira 0.002±0.01 0.07±0.21 0.0123
  Anaerostipes 0.0±0.0 0.01±0.04 0.0059
  Dorea 0.27±0.44 1.30±1.61 0.0355
  02d06 0.0±0.0 0.01±0.04 0.0233
  cc_115 0.0±0.0 0.01±0.02 0.0059
  f_Lachnospiraceae_Other 1.93±2.37 4.65±5.44 0.0328
  Turicibacter 0.0±0.0 0.02±0.09 0.0118
  f_Clostridiaceae_Other 0.01±0.05 0.35±1.43 0.0032
  Coprococcus 0.09±0.12 1.41±2.58 0.0002
  Lactobacillus 0.03±0.13 0.43±1.00 0.0143
  Epulopiscium 0.0±0.0 0.08±0.23 0.0454
  f_Christensenellaceae 0.008±0.02 0.31±0.88 0.0147
  f_Ruminococcaceae 1.61±1.63 4.93±4.95 0.0076
Fusobacteria Fusobacterium 9.4±19.6 1.6±3.9 0.0017
  Leptotrichia 0.3±0.6 0.0±0.0 0.0194
  Cetobacterium 0.0±0.0 0.10±0.40 0.0233
Proteobacteria Campylobacter 0.5±2.0 0.0±0.0 0.0122
  Ralstonia 2.1±4.2 0.9±4.3 <.0001
  f_Bradyrhizobiaceae 0.0±0.0 0.16±0.77 0.0454
  Acidocella 0.0±0.0 0.08±0.2 0.0233
  Stenotrophomonas 0.0±0.0 0.007±0.01 0.0454
  Bilophila 0.0±0.0 0.02±0.04 0.0014
Synergistetes TG5 0.3±0.7 0.0±0.0 0.0011
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure