Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2015 Apr 20;27(4):1171–1181. doi: 10.1037/pas0000118

Table 4.

Total BPD Symptom Composite Estimated Means and Difference (95% Confidence Interval)

Timeframe (Assessment) Intensive Suicide Assessment Control Assessment Difference (95% CI)
All Participants
 Entire Study (W&M) 1.17 (1.02,1.33) 1.08 (.92,1.24) .09 (−.13,.31)
 Main Obs. (W) 1.11 (.95,1.27) .96 (.80,1.13) .15 (−.09,.38)
 Main Obs. (D) .53 (.44, .67) .46 (.36,.55) .08 (−.06,.21)
 Main Obs. (ESM) .51 (.41, .60) .47 (.37, .57) .04 (−.11,.18)
 Follow-up (M) 1.21 (1.05,1.37) 1.15 (.99,1.31) .06 (−.16,.29)
Non-BPD
 Entire Study (W&M) .87 (.71, 1.03) .77 (.61, .94) .10 (−.13,.33)
 Main Obs. (W) .79 (.62, .96) .65 (.47, .82) .14 (−.10,.38)
 Main Obs. (D) .37 (.27, .47) .29 (.19, .39) .08 (−.06,.22)
 Main Obs. (ESM) .33 (.23, .43) .28 (.17, .38) .05 (−.09,.20)
 Follow-up (M) .93 (.77, 1.09) .85 (.68, 1.02) .08 (−.15,.32)
BPD
 Entire Study (W&M) 1.86 (1.62,2.11) 1.80 (1.55,2.05) .06 (−.29,.41)
 Main Obs. (W) 1.86 (1.60,2.11) 1.72 (1.45, 1.99) .14 (−.24,.51)
 Main Obs. (D) .91 (.76, 1.05) .86 (.71, 1.02) .05 (−.17,.26)
 Main Obs. (ESM) .90 (.75, 1.06) .89 (.73, 1.05) .01 (−.21,.24)
 Follow-up (M) 1.87 (1.62,2.12) 1.84 (1.59, 2.10) .03 (−.33,.39)

Note: Significance tests were one-tailed, CIs are two-tailed. None of the differences reached significance at p < .10 or p < .05. W = Weekly assessments, M = Monthly assessments, D = Daily assessments, ESM = ESM assessments