Table 3.

Predictors of Consistent Condom Use and Condomless Sex with Casual Partners (n = 378)

Condomless sex vs. No sex
	expB	95%CI
Age	0.98	0.92, 1.05
Race (ref = non-White)	0.62	0.27, 1.43
Sexual Identity (ref = gay/bisexual)	0.13**	0.06, 0.27
Relationship Status and Concordance (ref = single)
Seroconcordant Partner	0.84	0.42, 1.68
Serodiscordant Partner	0.30*	0.11, 0.80
Viral Load (ref = undetectable)	1.27	0.63, 2.54
AUDIT	1.14*	1.03, 1.27
DAST	1.15*	1.04, 1.27
Sexual Identity X AUDIT	0.93	0.76, 1.14
Condomless sex vs. Consistent condom use
Age	0.99	0.91, 1.07
Race (ref = non-White)	1.06	0.35, 3.16
Sexual Identity (ref = gay/bisexual)	0.22**	0.09, 0.53
Relationship Status and Concordance (ref = single)
Seroconcordant Partner	0.94	0.40, 2.22
Serodiscordant Partner	0.36	0.11, 1.14
Viral Load (ref = undetectable)	1.00	0.44, 2.26
AUDIT	0.99	0.88, 1.12
DAST	1.10	0.98, 1.23
Sexual Identity X AUDIT	1.16	0.92, 1.48
Consistent condom use vs. No sex
Age	1.00	0.94, 1.06
Race (ref = non-White)	0.63	0.26, 1.52
Sexual Identity (ref = gay/bisexual)	0.55*	0.30, 1.00
Relationship Status and Concordance (ref = single)
Seroconcordant Partner	0.77	0.38, 1.56
Serodiscordant Partner	0.82	0.39, 1.72
Viral Load (ref = undetectable)	1.23	0.63, 2.39
AUDIT	1.15*	1.02, 1.29
DAST	1.05	0.96, 1.15
Sexual Identity X AUDIT	0.80*	0.67, 0.94

^*p <.05;

^**p ≤.01