Table 2.
Top 15 Most Abundant Luminal-Associated Bacterial Genera
| HCC | FWD | RST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactobacillus spp. | 30.06 ± 9.61 | 37.56 ± 8.19 | 20.50 ± 5.27 | |
| S24-7, g__ | 22.54 ± 3.26 | 18.81 ± 2.30 | 13.16 ± 2.25** | RST vs. HCC |
| Clostridiales; f__; g__ | 12.42 ± 1.73 | 14.25 ± 2.83 | 20.75 ± 6.60 | |
| Lachnospiraceae; g__ | 9.90 ± 4.55 | 7.11 ± 1.34 | 15.57 ± 3.61 | |
| Rikenellaceae; g__ | 4.52 ± 0.50 | 4.71 ± 0.80 | 7.17 ± 0.70 | |
| Bacteroides spp | 3.56 ± 1.06 | 2.20 ± 0.29 | 7.74 ± 2.13 | |
| Unassigned | 3.32 ± 0.43 | 3.74 ± 0.27 | 2.57 ± 0.21** | RST vs. FWD |
| Candidatus Athromitus | 4.19 ± 1.08 | 1.02 ± 0.40 | 1.50 ± 0.51** | HCC vs. FWD |
| Oscillospira spp. | 1.06 ± 0.22 | 0.88 ± 0.15 | 2.10 ± 0.61 | |
| Prevotella spp | 0.38 ± 0.22 | 0.90 ± 0.30 | 2.04 ± 1.28 | |
| Adlercreutzia spp. | 2.11 ± 0.38 | 1.61 ± 0.30 | 0.20 ± 0.02** | RST vs. HCC/FWD |
| Ruminococcaceae; g__ | 0.89 ± 0.20 | 1.23 ± 0.28 | 1.90 ± 0.56 | |
| Lachnospiraceae; Ruminococcus | 1.62 ± 0.81 | 1.08 ± 0.30 | 0.63 ± 0.25 | |
| Lachnospiraceae; Other | 0.75 ± 0.29 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.64 ± 0.25 | |
| Ruminococcaceae; Ruminococcus | 0.21 ± 0.09 | 0.91 ± 0.21 | 0.55 ± 0.11** | HCC vs. FWD |
Data are the mean relative abundance ± standard error.
*
* P < .05, * p = .05