Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;16:309. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0772-2

Table 2.

Risk of cancer in biologic-naïve and TNFi-treated RA patients compared with the Australian general population, and relative risk in the TNFi treated patients compared to biologic naïve patients

Risk of cancer in biologic-naïve RA patients compared with the general population Risk of cancer in TNFi-treated patients compared with the general population Relative risk (95 % CI) of cancer in TNFi-treated RA patients compared with biologic-naïve RA patients
Site O E SIR (95 % CI) O E SIR (95 % CI) RR (95 % CI)b
All invasive cancers 32 23.38 1.37 (0.97, 1.94) 44 56.78 0.77 (0.58, 1.04) 0.65 (0.37, 1.17)
Melanoma 5 1.84 2.72 (1.13, 6.53) 10 4.92 2.03 (1.09, 3.78) 0.54 (0.12, 2.40)
Lung 6 2.41 2.49 (1.12, 5.53) 4 5.23 0.77 (0.29, 2.04) 0.24 (0.05, 1.17)
Lymphoid cancersa 1 1.49 0.67 (0.09, 4.76) 6 3.54 1.69 (0.76, 3.77) 4.01 (0.18, 88.19)
Colorectal 2 3.41 0.59 (0.15, 2.35) 1 7.75 0.13 (0.02, 0.92) 0.06 (0.001, 3.28)
Prostate 5 3.38 1.48 (0.62, 3.55) 7 7.71 0.91 (0.43, 1.90) 1.21 (0.33, 4.45)
Female breast 5 3.32 1.51 (0.63, 3.62) 4 10.29 0.39 (0.15, 1.04) 0.17 (0.03, 0.95)

TNFi tumour necrosis factor inhibitor, RA rheumatoid arthritis, SIR standardised incidence rate, NHL non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; aLymphoid cancers includes all leukaemias and lymphomas, RR relative risk; badjusted for age, sex, calendar year, smoking status, methotrexate use and prior malignancy