Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 15;6(11):1130–1139. doi: 10.7150/jca.12719

Table 1.

Comparison of the patients' characteristics and clinicopathological features between low and high PKM2 expression groups

Clinicopathological variables PKM2 expression
Low High P value
No. % No. %
Age(years)
<50 58 40.6 71 46.4 0.311
≥50 85 59.4 82 53.6
Menopausal status
pre 57 39.9 67 43.8 0.493
post 86 60.1 86 56.2
Family history of cancer
yes 41 31.1 44 31.9 0.884
no 91 68.9 94 68.1
Tumor size (T stage)
T1 63 45 87 58.8 0.008*
T2 59 42.1 55 37.2
T3 18 12.9 6 4
Lymph node stage
N0 82 58.1 66 43.7 0.047*
N1 31 22.0 37 24.5
N2 11 7.8 24 15.9
N3 17 12.1 24 15.9
Histological grade
9 6.3 10 6.6 0.886
106 74.7 109 72.2
27 19 32 21.2
ER status
NEG 47 33.8 51 33.3 0.931
POS 92 66.2 102 66.7
PR status
NEG 66 47.5 66 43.1 0.456
POS 73 52.5 87 56.9
HER2 status
NEG 123 88.5 135 88.2 0.946
POS 16 11.5 18 11.8
Ki67 status
<20 57 41.9 59 39.3 0.657
≥20 79 58.1 91 60.7
Molecular subtypes
Luminal A 55 40.4 58 38.7 0.815
Luminal B 35 25.7 46 30.7
HER2 enriched 13 9.6 14 9.3
Basal like 33 24.3 32 21.3
Clinical staging
38 27.5 37 25.2 0.255
68 49.3 62 42.2
31 22.5 44 29.9
1 0.7 4 2.7

Lymph node stage: N0, indicates no lymph node metastasis; N1, 1-3 lymph node metastasis; N2, 4-9 lymph node metastasis; N3, ≥10 lymph node metastasis; ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; HER-2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; NEG: negative expression; POS: positive expression; Analysis was limited to patients for whom data were available; *indicates P<0.05.