Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Mol Mutagen. 2014 Dec 6;56(3):277–285. doi: 10.1002/em.21923

TABLE II.

Session 2 SWOT Analyses: Biomarkers of Epigenetic Changes and their Applicability to Genetic Toxicology

Test/System Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Epigenetic control
of cell
phenotype
Assay is predictive of chemical
exposures, including
genotoxins.
Analysis of RNA modification
spectra provides
insights into mechanisms
of toxicity.
Possible complementation to
transcriptional and proteomic
data for identifying
genotoxic and nongenotoxic
carcinogens.
Relatively straightforward
method for practitioners
of analytical chemistry.
Analysis of RNA modification
spectra in very early
stages of development.
Very limited data for toxicants.
Relatively specialized
method at this point.
Probably not entirely
predictive of carcinogenicity of
a chemical or drug candi-
date.
Interlaboratory validation
will be needed.
Possible coordination of RNA
modification analysis with
other ‘omic data sets.
Application to in vitro screening
for hazard assessment.
Provides insights into mechanisms
of action of toxicants.
Possible biomarkers that are
specific for non-genotoxic
carcinogens.
Allow distinction between
genotoxic and nongenotoxic
carcinogens.
Analysis of RNA modification
reprogramming is in
the earliest stages of scientific
acceptance and
application.
Translation to a high-
throughput method.
Relating RNA modification
patterns to specific
toxicities.
Epigenetics Provides comprehensive
view of modifications or
changes that may precede
events that lead to phenotypic
change or toxicity.
Rich biomarker resource.
Potential for assessment of
species-specific responses
in vivo and in vitro.
Large and complex datasets;
need for customized
bioinformatic tools.
Huge number of changes
observed many possible.
mechanisms/outcomes
High probability for
nonspecific or irrelevant
responses.
Distinguishing stress
responses from chemical-
specific responses.
Biomarkers for use in acute and
subchronic toxicity studies.
Early prediction of genotoxic
risk; inform or replace 2-year
bioassay.
Drug-induced vs. non-drug-
induced tumors.
Provide or support carcinogen
mode-of-action determinations.
May allow identification of pre-
neoplastic changes.
Tremendous complexity with
possibility of compound-
specific effects rather than
class-effects amenable to
generalized biomarkers
generation.
Translation of findings from
preclinical models/results
to humans.
Epigenetic traits as
biomarkers of
carcinogenesis
Early appearance of epigenetic
carcinogen-alterations.
Target tissue specificity.
Specificity for genotoxic and
nongenotoxic carcinogens.
Cellular epigenome individual
and dynamic variability not
completely
characterized.
Models for safety assessment
not yet developed.
Endpoints and techniques for
use in safety assessment
not established.
Interlaboratory reproducibility
not determined.
Early prediction and identification
of hazardous compounds
before their dissemination
into environment.
Provide or support carcinogen
mode-of-action
determinations.
Complexity of cellular epi-
genomic landscape and
epigenetic regulatory
mechanisms.
Correlating epigenomic
changes between test animal
species and humans.
MicroRNA analysis with
lentivirus platform
This analysis provides data
to progress towards more
clinically relevant therapeutic
applications.
The lentivirus system used is
commercially available
and serves as a proof-of-
concept to move forward.
Lentivirus platform explored
may not be the best plat-
form for human patient
delivery.
Provides background for
developing and evaluating better
and more clinically relevant
miRNA delivery mechanisms.
Lack of approval for use of
lentivirus in humans for
ethical reasons.
Advancement of better,
clinically relevant delivery
agents needed.
Multiple companies on board
with the development
phase.
Patent protection and
confidentiality agreements limit
access.