. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Nov;109(5):836–855. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000034

Table 3.

Intimacy and Trust within Relationships as Moderators of Intrapersonal Emotion Regulation’s Associations with Depressive Symptoms in Study 2b (N = 558)

Intimacy	Outcome: Depressive Symptoms
Intimacy	b	SE	β	p
Maladaptive ER	8.40	0.44	.61	<.001
Intimacy	−4.63	0.68	−.22	<.001
Intimacy X Maladaptive ER	−3.46	0.88	−.12	<.001
F			197.63	<.001
Adjusted R²			.52

Adaptive ER	−3.61	0.46	−.30	<.001
Intimacy	−6.98	0.81	−.33	<.001
Intimacy X Adaptive ER	1.37	0.95	.05	.15
F			63.79	<.001
Adjusted R²			.25

Trust

Maladaptive ER	8.83	0.42	0.64	<.001
Trust	−5.11	0.73	−.21	<.001
Trust X Maladaptive ER	−2.67	0.97	−.08	.01
F			198.94	<.001
Adjusted R²			.52

Adaptive ER	−3.92	0.47	−.32	<.001
Trust	−6.37	0.94	−.27	<.001
Trust X Adaptive ER	0.43	1.08	.02	.69
F			52.27	<.001
Adjusted R²			.22

Outcome variable is depressive symptoms (BDI-II; Beck et al., 1996). Maladaptive and adaptive ER are composites of ER strategies: see text for details. Intimacy = log-transformed sum of emotional and intellectual intimacy subscales of Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR; Schaefer & Olson, 1981). Trust = log-transformed dependability subscale of Trust Scale (Rempel et al., 1985). All variables centered around their means.