Abstract
Acceptance of the rough constancy of rates of molecular evolution, averaged over tens of millions of years, is widely used to date the splitting between taxa. However, for the study of speciation a hypothesis of rough constancy over tens of millions of years is of little use. In order to date the splitting of congeneric species within defined ranges of uncertainty, we need to know the variation of evolutionary rates over shorter periods of time. Such estimates of uncertainty are particularly useful if they apply to techniques of molecular comparisons that lend themselves to the assessment of intraspecific variation. We have measured protein divergence by electrophoresis and mitochondrial DNA differentiation by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in three pairs of sea urchin species believed to have resulted from the simultaneous fragmentation of ranges of marine species by the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama, about 3 million years ago. Transisthmian isozyme divergence in these pairs varies by an order of magnitude; mitochondrial DNA divergence, on the other hand, is equivalent in all pairs, suggesting that this molecule, assayed by endonucleases, can provide fairly accurate estimates of times since separation in the 3-million-year range.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beverley S. M., Wilson A. C. Ancient origin for Hawaiian Drosophilinae inferred from protein comparisons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4753–4757. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.14.4753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie J. H. Variability of evolutionary rates of DNA. Genetics. 1986 Aug;113(4):1077–1091. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.4.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keigwin L. Isotopic paleoceanography of the Caribbean and East pacific: role of panama uplift in late neogene time. Science. 1982 Jul 23;217(4557):350–353. doi: 10.1126/science.217.4557.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lessios H. A. Evidencia preliminar de una duplicación del gen en la evolución de la clase Echinoidea. Rev Med Panama. 1981 Jan;6(1):46–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mueller L. D., Ayala F. J. Estimation and interpretation of genetic distance in empirical studies. Genet Res. 1982 Oct;40(2):127–137. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300019005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M., Li W. H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M., Miller J. C. A simple method for estimating average number of nucleotide substitutions within and between populations from restriction data. Genetics. 1990 Aug;125(4):873–879. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.4.873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarich V. M., Wilson A. C. Immunological time scale for hominid evolution. Science. 1967 Dec 1;158(3805):1200–1203. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3805.1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahata N. On the overdispersed molecular clock. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):169–179. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vawter L., Brown W. M. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA comparisons reveal extreme rate variation in the molecular clock. Science. 1986 Oct 10;234(4773):194–196. doi: 10.1126/science.3018931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson A. C., Carlson S. S., White T. J. Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:573–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]