Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov;55(11):2416–2422. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P052522

TABLE 3.

Individual loci that exert differing effects in obese versus lean subjects

Obese Lean Interaction
Locus Lead SNP Allelea Trait nb β (SE)c P n β (SE) P n β (SE) PInteraction d
LPL rs12678919 G TG 945 –0.148 (0.03) 4.03E–06 932 –0.050 (0.03) 1.13E–01 1,877 –0.21 (0.06) 6.99E–04 0.01
APOA5 rs964184 G TG 1,078 0.159 (0.03) 1.31E–07 1,282 0.14 (0.03) 1.91E–07 2,360 0.15 (0.06) 8.87E–03 0.02
GCKR rs1260326 T TG 1,189 0.0932 (0.03) 1.21E–03 1,569 0.067 (0.02) 6.84E–03 2,758 0.12 (0.05) 2.82E–02 0.03
CETP rs3764261 A HDL 1,083 0.132 (0.03) 1.67E–06 1,238 0.189 (0.03) 3.15E–13 2,415 –0.21 (0.05) 1.14E–05 0.005882
GALNT2 rs4846914 G HDL 1,212 –0.065 (0.03) 1.24E–02 1,463 –0.002 (0.02) 9.39E–01 2,829 –0.13 (0.05) 3.03E–03 0.011765
LIPG rs7241918 G HDL 1,061 –0.004 (0.03) 8.96E–01 1,178 –0.102 (0.03) 1.35E–04 2,329 0.13 (0.05) 7.00E–03 0.017647
PLTP rs6065906 C HDL 1,184 –0.034 (0.03) 2.01E–01 1,435 –0.107 (0.02) 1.19E–05 2,769 0.10 (0.04) 2.08E–02 0.023529
a

Active allele analyzed.

b

Number of nonmissing individuals with complete information used in analysis.

c

β coefficient for regression; measured in mM (standard error).

d

FDR of 20% displayed. All achieved FDR <20%; APOA5, GALNT2, and LIPG achieved FDR <10%; LPL and CETP achieved FDR <5%.