Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;5(3):167–174. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2015.5.3.167

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups.

Characteristics ESWT Group Cryo-US Group p Value (95%;CI)
Patients, no. 40 40

Age, mean±SD, (range), years 49.7±9.9 (25–74) 53.4±10.8 (32–75) 0.114 (−8.31; 0.912)

Gender, no.(%)
Male 29 (72.5) 24 (60) 0.344 (−0.08; 0.32)
Female 11 (27.5) 16 (40)

Duration of symptoms, mean±SD, (range), months 5.5±1.5 (4–8) 6±1.5 (4–8) 0.117 (−1.17; 0.17)

Side, no.(%)
Right 29 (72.5) 29 (72.5) 0.802 (−0.19; 0.19)
Left 11 (27.5) 11 (27.5)

Patients affected in their dominant arm, no. (%) 31 (77.5) 30 (75) 1.000 (−0.16; 0.21)

VAS on resisted extension of the wrist, mean±SD, (range), cm 6.5±1.5 (6–9) 6.6±1.6 (6–10) 0.774 (−0.79; 0.59)

Previous treatments, no (%)
NSAIDs 23 (57.5) 22 (55.0) 1.000 (−0.18; 0.23)
Functional brace 3 (7.5) 6 (15.0) 0.479 (−0.22; 0.07)
Rest 14 (35.0) 12 (30.0) 0.811 (−0.15; 0.25)

Abbreviations: ESWT, extracorporeal shockwave therapy; Cryo-US, cryoultrasound therapy; CI, confidence interval; no., number; SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analogue scale.