Table 1.
Barefoot | Soccer boots | Futsal trainers | Running shoes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Firm surface | ||||
Double leg stance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Single leg stance | 0.5±0.7 | 0.1±0.3 | 0.6±0.6 | 0.3±0.4 |
Tandem | 0.4±0.6 | 0.0 | 0.2±0.4 | 0.1±0.3 |
Total | 1±0.9 | 0.1±0.3 | 0.8±0.8 | 0.3±0.4 |
| ||||
Foam surface | ||||
Double leg stance | 0.1±0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.3±0.4 |
Single leg stance | 6.8±2.4 | 4.8±2.2 | 4.8±2.1 | 3.5±1.2 |
Tandem | 4.5±2.7 | 3.4±2.5 | 2.6±1.8 | 2.3±1.5 |
Total | 11.4±4.4 | 8.1±3.8 | 7.3±2.8 | 6±2.3 |
| ||||
BESS total | 12.3±5.0 | 8.3±3.7 | 8.1±3.1 | 6.2±2.4 |
Footnote: The 24 soccer players performed the test in 6 conditions (double-leg, single-leg, and tandem stances on firm and foam surfaces) with three type of shoes (soccer boots, futsal trainers, running shoes) and barefoot. The data are expressed as an mean +/− standard deviation.