Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press). 2014 Sep 3;2(2):139–161. doi: 10.1017/nws.2014.13

Table 2.

Edge overlap between networks constructed using different data types and edge weighting methods, averaged over all edge cut-offs. Each column denotes the edge weighting method or data type used as the basis for comparison between networks. The column denoted by “Line cross” compares networks constructed from the line cross data using correlation to networks constructed from the line cross data using mutual information. The column denoted by “Treatment” compares networks constructed from the treatment data using correlation to networks constructed from the treatment data using mutual information. The column denoted by “Correlation” compares networks constructed from the line cross data using correlation to networks constructed from the treatment data using correlation. The column denoted by “MI” compares networks constructed from the line cross data using mutual information to networks constructed from the treatment data using mutual information.

Line cross Treatment Correlation MI
mean 30.85% 40.23% 11.98% 14.06%
min 29.41% 32.08% 9.23% 11.70%
max 33.12% 45.82% 13.37% 18.82%
stdev 0.51% 4.30% 1.35% 2.13%