Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):502–513. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12292

Table 2.

Importance of factors to opinions about whether results should be offered to the family members of a deceased participant in a general biobank (n=33)

Not at all
important
Somewhat
important
Very
important
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Statements in the consent form regarding whether or not individual genetic research results might be disclosed to family members 2 (6) 6 (18) 25 (76)
The level of clinical validity of the results
(The accuracy with which the presence of a gene variant predicts the presence of a clinical condition or predisposition)
2 (6) 8 (24) 23 (70)
The level of clinical utility of the results
(The availability and effectiveness of interventions aimed at avoiding the adverse clinical consequences of a gene variant)
3 (9) 8 (24) 21 (64)
The reproductive implications associated with the results
(Results that may not affect the participants’ health but suggest risk for disease among offspring, e.g., carrier status)
3 (9) 15 (45) 15 (45)
The seriousness of the condition associated the results
(The level of morbidity and mortality expected if the person develops the condition associated with the gene variant)
2 (6) 13 (39) 18 (55)
Whether or not the results were generated (or confirmed) in a CLIA-certified lab
(Standards that apply to labs that report patient-specific results “for the purpose of providing information for the diagnosis, prevention, treatment of disease, or impairment of, or assessment of health”)
3 (9) 18 (55) 12 (36)

Percentages may not sum to 100% due to missing data