Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biofouling. 2015 Sep;31(8):665–675. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2015.1083985

Table 1.

Average log(CFU cm-2) for biofilm thermal shock experiments.

Thermal shock
Temp. (°C)
Exposure time (min)
1 2 5 10 15 20 30
37 8.68 ± 0.38 8.37 ± 0.68 8.15 ± 0.51 8.79 ± 0.58 8.46 ± 0.78 8.34 ± 0.48 9.08 ± 0.70
50 8.21 ± 0.29 8.07 ± 0.50 7.65 ± 0.62 7.41 ± 0.27 7.66 ± 0.55 6.92 ± 0.61 6.88 ± 0.64
60 7.38 ± 0.59 7.47 ± 0.79 5.59 ± 0.78 5.32 ± 1.38 5.03 ± 0.87 4.14 ± 0.50 4.69 ± 0.76
70 6.13 ± 0.65 4.92 ± 0.65 4.51 ± 0.93 3.99 ± 0.59 3.63 ± 0.55 4.38 ± 0.77 3.69 ± 0.72
80 4.66 ± 0.69 4.36 ± 1.09 3.64 ± 0.76 3.23 ± 0.22 4.21 ± 0.60 3.21 ± 0.62 2.58 ± 0.61

Heat shocks at 37°C were comparable controls. As heat shock temperature or exposure time increases, the average log(CFU cm−2) decreases. SDs (n ≥ 9) are indicated with ±. Bright red cells indicate large CFU densities while bright blue cells indicate low CFU densities.