Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 19;14:412. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0927-5

Table 3.

RDT, LM and qPCR of peripheral blood and detection active P. falciparum placental infection on histology (n = 158)

Placental infection (histology) Sensitivity (%) (95 % CI) Specificity (%) (95 % CI) PPV (%) (95 % CI) NPV (%) (95 % CI)
Positive (n = 31) Negative (n = 127)
RDT
 Positive (n = 21) 14 7 45.2 (27.3, 64.0) 94.5 (89.0, 97.8) 66.7 (43.0, 85.4) 87.6 (80.9, 92.6)
 Negative (n = 137) 17 117
LM
 Positive (n = 16) 14 2 45.2 (27.3, 64.0) 98.4 (94.4, 99.8) 87.5 (61.7, 98.4) 88.0 (81.5, 92.9)
 Negative (n = 142) 17 125
qPCR
 Positive (n = 15) 13 2 41.9 (24.5, 60.9) 98.4 (94.4, 99.8) 86.7 (59.5, 98.3) 87.4 (80.8, 92.4)
 Negative (n = 143) 18 125
LM + RDT
 Positive (n = 25) 17 8 54.8 (36.0, 72.7) 93.7 (88.0, 97.2) 68.0 (46.5, 85.1) 89.5 (83.0, 94.1)
 Negative (n = 133) 14 119

Performance characteristics of RDT and LM for detection of active placental malaria on placental histology. RDT rapid diagnostic test, LM light microscopy, qPCR real-time polymerase chain reaction, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value. Sensitivities and specificities of RDT, LM and qPCR were not statistically different (all P > 0.05, Liddell’s exact test)