Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 May 5;43(11):2722–2734. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1327-2

Table 2. Percent Differences in 18F-FDG Parameter Estimates for the Right Heart Input Function Model Relative to the Delayed Input Function Model.

Control LPS Lavage + LPS
k1 43.1 [31.0,61.8]b 50.3 [28.3,65.3]b 17.9 [9.8,34.0]b,c
k2 33.0 [23.0,46.4]b 46.8 [18.8,62.1]b 25.9 [10.8,35.4]b
k3 -5.1 [-9.2,-2.9]b,d 0.7 [-6.4,14.1] 3.9 [1.2,9.0]a
FB -27.0 [-33.1,-21.2]b -22.9 [-35.1,-17.3]b -18.2 [-31.3,-13.9]b
Fe 9.5 [8.1,15.1]b,d 2.9 [0.6,9.0]a -1.8 [-4.1,0.9]
Ki 5.1 [3.6,5.9]b 2.9 [2.0,11.3]b 4.4 [2.2,6.3]b

Shown are median [25th, 75th percentiles] for % error.

a

p<0.05,

b

p<0.01 for null hypothesis that difference is equal to 0;

c

p<0.05,

d

p<0.01 vs. both other groups