Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2015 Jul 28;121(21):3914–3921. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29602

Table 2.

Application of Main 4-Leaf Model and Alternative 6-Leaf Model on Admission and Subsequent Days

4-Leaf Model
Shift N* PPS≤20%, drooping present
N (%)
PPS ≤20%, drooping absent
N (%)
PPS 30–60%
N (%)
PPS ≥70%
N (%)
Diagnostic accuracy, %
1 351 19 (84) 68 (40) 227 (15) 37 (3) 81
3 322 29 (72) 63 (43) 199 (17) 31 (3) 79
5 282 30 (77) 50 (38) 172 (13) 30 (10) 82
7 243 23 (78) 44 (41) 150 (13) 25 (4) 82
9 202 16 (69) 40 (40) 121 (10) 25 (4) 83
11 161 16 (62) 28 (29) 101 (11) 16 (0) 84
6-Leaf Model
Shift N* PPS≤20%, drooping present
N (%)
PPS≤20%, drooping absent, ≥2 late signs
N (%)
PPS ≤20%, drooping absent, 0–1 late signs
N (%)
PPS 30–60%, ≥2 late signs
N (%)
PPS 30–60%, 0–1 late signs
N (%)
PPS ≥70%
N (%)
Diagnostic accuracy, %
1 328 19 (84) 21 (62) 41 (32) 34 (26) 176 (14) 37 (3) 82
3 307 29 (72) 17 (65) 42 (36) 32 (22) 156 (15) 31 (3) 80
5 270 30 (77) 16 (62) 30 (27) 27 (26) 137 (10) 30 (10) 83
7 235 23 (78) 16 (69) 25 (28) 26 (31) 119 (8) 26 (4) 85
9 191 16 (69) 10 (80) 25 (28) 18 (39) 97 (4) 25 (4) 86
11 153 16 (62) 7 (43) 20 (25) 11 (45) 83 (6) 16 (0) 84
*

The number of patients varies over time because (1) for each row, we only included patients with complete data for the two variables (PPS and drooping of nasolabial fold), and (2) some patients died or were discharged from the hospital

The total number of patients (N) and the proportion of patients who died in 3 days (%) were shown for each leaf in the recursive partitioning model

Accuracy = 1 − misclassification rate = [True positive + True negative]/[True positive + True negative + False positive + False negative] in 2 × 2 diagnostic tables with the predicted outcome (death in 3 days or not) against the gold standard (actual 3-day mortality).[14]

Abbreviations: PPS, palliative performance scale