Table 2.
4-Leaf Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shift | N* | PPS≤20%, drooping present N (%)† |
PPS ≤20%, drooping absent N (%)† |
PPS 30–60% N (%)† |
PPS ≥70% N (%)† |
Diagnostic accuracy, %‡ |
1 | 351 | 19 (84) | 68 (40) | 227 (15) | 37 (3) | 81 |
3 | 322 | 29 (72) | 63 (43) | 199 (17) | 31 (3) | 79 |
5 | 282 | 30 (77) | 50 (38) | 172 (13) | 30 (10) | 82 |
7 | 243 | 23 (78) | 44 (41) | 150 (13) | 25 (4) | 82 |
9 | 202 | 16 (69) | 40 (40) | 121 (10) | 25 (4) | 83 |
11 | 161 | 16 (62) | 28 (29) | 101 (11) | 16 (0) | 84 |
6-Leaf Model | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shift | N* | PPS≤20%, drooping present N (%)† |
PPS≤20%, drooping absent, ≥2 late signs N (%)† |
PPS ≤20%, drooping absent, 0–1 late signs N (%)† |
PPS 30–60%, ≥2 late signs N (%)† |
PPS 30–60%, 0–1 late signs N (%)† |
PPS ≥70% N (%)† |
Diagnostic accuracy, %‡ |
1 | 328 | 19 (84) | 21 (62) | 41 (32) | 34 (26) | 176 (14) | 37 (3) | 82 |
3 | 307 | 29 (72) | 17 (65) | 42 (36) | 32 (22) | 156 (15) | 31 (3) | 80 |
5 | 270 | 30 (77) | 16 (62) | 30 (27) | 27 (26) | 137 (10) | 30 (10) | 83 |
7 | 235 | 23 (78) | 16 (69) | 25 (28) | 26 (31) | 119 (8) | 26 (4) | 85 |
9 | 191 | 16 (69) | 10 (80) | 25 (28) | 18 (39) | 97 (4) | 25 (4) | 86 |
11 | 153 | 16 (62) | 7 (43) | 20 (25) | 11 (45) | 83 (6) | 16 (0) | 84 |
The number of patients varies over time because (1) for each row, we only included patients with complete data for the two variables (PPS and drooping of nasolabial fold), and (2) some patients died or were discharged from the hospital
The total number of patients (N) and the proportion of patients who died in 3 days (%) were shown for each leaf in the recursive partitioning model
Accuracy = 1 − misclassification rate = [True positive + True negative]/[True positive + True negative + False positive + False negative] in 2 × 2 diagnostic tables with the predicted outcome (death in 3 days or not) against the gold standard (actual 3-day mortality).[14]
Abbreviations: PPS, palliative performance scale