Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Nanopart Res. 2012 Aug 7;14:1029. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1029-8

Table 1.

Possible group-specific categories and modes of action for nanoparticles related to hazard and risk assessment

Group-specific considerations Higher solubility particles Poorly soluble, low toxicity (PSLT) particles Poorly soluble, high toxicity particles Fibrous particles
Example benchmark particles Zinc oxide
Copper oxide (I)
Titanium dioxide
Carbon black
Crystalline silica
Nickel oxide (III)
Carbon nanotubes
Carbon nanofibers
Adverse effects Acute lung effects
Systemic toxicity
Lung inflammation and fibrosis; lung cancer (rats) Chromiun oxide (III) Lung inflammation and fibrosis; lung cancer Lung fibrosis, possible cancer, and mesothelioma
Mode of action Toxic ions reach systemic tissues Toxicity related to total deposited or retained particle dose in target respiratory tract region based on particle size Same as PSLT; plus reactive surface (e.g., reactive oxygen species) Durability/biopersistence
Migration into alveolar walls and from lung tissue to the pleural
Interference with normal cell division
Genotoxicity
Dose metric related to adverse effects Dissolution rate; amount absorbed into blood Surface area
Volume
Mass or number, by particle size fraction
Same dose metrics as PSLT; plus reactivity of particle surface Number of fibers of certain dimensions
Total surface area of fibers or nanotubes
Dose–response relationship Slope and effect level may depend on dissolution May be nonlinear at low doses Steeper slope and lower effect level than PSLT Linear dose–response for some endpoints