Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;10(10):e0140497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140497

Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates of animal origin used in this study.

Antimicrobial resistance profile Antimicrobial subclasses Isolates Source Isolates
----------No.---------- --No.-- -----------------No.-----------------
ERY-PEN-TET-GEN-CHL-CIP-QUI 7 1 Pork meat 1
ERY-PEN-TET-CHL-CIP-QUI 6 1 Pork meat 1
ERY-PEN-TET-CHL 4 2 Pig 2
ERY-PEN-TET-KAN 4 1 Pork meat 1
ERY-PEN-TET 3 14 Pork meat 11
3 a
PEN-TET-GEN 3 1 Sheep 1
PEN-TET-KAN 3 1 Pork meat 1 a
PEN-TET-CHL 3 1 Pig 1
ERY-PEN 2 4 Pork meat 3
1 a
ERY-TET 2 5 Pork meat 5
PEN-TET 2 39 Pig 19
Sheep 17
Pork meat 2
Chicken meat 1
ERY 1 4 Chicken meat 3
Chicken deli meat 1
PEN 1 21 Pig 7
Sheep 1
Pork meat 4
Beef 4
Chicken meat 3
Ham 2
TET 1 10 Sheep 6
Pork meat 3
Chicken meat 1

Ciprofloxacin (CIP); chloramphenicol (CHL); erythromycin (ERY); gentamicin (GEN); kanamycin (KAN); quinupristin/dalfopristin (QUI); penicillin (PEN); and tetracycline (TET).

a mecA positive.

Adapted from Buyukcangaz et al. (2013) [15], considering the resistance according to CLSI (2012) criteria [34].