Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr 24;42(6):1656–1665. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24929

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

a. Boxplot showing the ADC values, comparing bilateral DWI and rFOV DWI categorized by diagnosis.

b. Bland Altman plot showing difference in ADC value (bilateral DWI – rFOV DWI) versus mean ADC value

c. ROC curves, showing the discriminative abilities of bilateral and rFOV DWI based on ADC values

d. ROC curves, showing the discriminative abilities of the readers based on BI-RADS classification on peak contrast T1w images, bilateral DWI, and rFOV DWI

Corresponding AUC values were
Reader 1: peak contrast T1w : 0.89 (0.77–1.00)
bilateral DWI : 0.76 (0.58–0.93)
rFOV DWI : 0.93 (0.84–1.00)
Reader 2: peak contrast T1w : 0.91 (0.80–1.00)
bilateral DWI : 0.61 (0.40–0.81)
rFOV DWI : 0.71 (0.52–0.90)
Reader 3: peak contrast T1w : 0.87 (0.73–1.00)
bilateral DWI : 0.64 (0.44–0.84)
rFOV DWI : 0.76 (0.59–0.94)