Table 3.
Meta-analysis of 94 trials on the estimated effect of parasitic infection on sheep performance
Production trait | Infection type | Number of trials | Ratio production infected/control | 95 % C.I. | Number of trials reporting egg excretion | Mean number of eggs per gram faeces in infected animals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight gain | Mixed speciesa | 30 | 0.74 | 0.71–0.77 | 22 | 2336 |
Weight gain | H. contortus | 20 | 0.79 | 0.71–0.87 | 20 | 4019 |
Weight gain | T. colubriformis | 12 | 0.78 | 0.71–0.87 | 12 | 1070 |
Weight gain | T. circumcincta | 8 | 0.81 | 0.66–0.99 | 4 | 296 |
Wool production | Mixed speciesa | 14 | 0.9 | 0.86–0.93 | 11 | 3788 |
Wool production | H. contortus | 2 | 1.04 | 0.96–1.13 | 2 | 7585 |
Wool production | T. colubriformis | 2 | 1.02 | 0.95–1.1 | 2 | 1359 |
Wool production | T. circumcincta | 1 | 0.83 | 0.81–0.86 | 1 | 201 |
Milk yield | Mixed speciesa | 5 | 0.78 | 0.73–0.84 | 1 | 527 |
aMain species were of the genus Haemonchus, Teladorsagia, Trichostrongylus, Cooperia and Nematodirus