Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0140796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140796

Table 1. Bivariate Pearson Correlation Coefficients (N = 145).

1 2 3 4 5 6
1. HDI
2. IHDI .978
[.969, .985]
3. MMR -.919 -.947
[-.940, -.896] [-.960, -.932]
4. IMR -.935 -.949 .942
[-.951, -.919] [-.962, -.935] [.922, .964]
5. ENMR -.894 -.915 .925 .978
[-.917, -.870] [-.937, -.892] [.898, .950] [.968, .985]
6. LNMR -.901 -.917 .909 .963 .942
[-.930, -.866] [-.946, -.878] [.848, .949] [.914, .984] [.897, .970]
7. PNMR -.923 -.937 .923 .989 .950 .951
[-.943, -.902] [-.953, -.919] [.892, .952] [.983, .993] [.925, .968] [.901, .977]

Note. Bootstrap results were based on 1,000 bootstrap samples. Bias corrected 95% confidence intervals are displayed in parentheses. All correlations were based on natural logarithmic transformations of the MMR, IMR, ENMR, LNMR, and PNMR variables.