Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 24;16:342. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0780-0

Table 4.

Comparisons with OCS method in the efficiency of the proposed pipeline

Data sets Size CPU time (s) GPU time (s)
OCS SEF-OCS OCS SEF-OCS
S T RE SR S T RE SR
OP_1 512*512*60 65 57 42 36 32 33 27 21 3.5 1.5
OP_2 512*512*88 77 69 53 50 41 47 48 36 4.6 2.5
OP_3 512*512*62 67 59 49 42 32 34 26 22 3.7 1.7
OP_4 512*512*67 69 61 46 44 33 34 29 23 4.1 1.9
OP_5 512*512*76 72 63 59 45 37 39 37 30 4.9 2.3
OP_6 512*512*101 89 73 67 65 45 57 46 45 6.7 3.5
OP_7 512*512*71 71 63 53 49 35 36 36 26 5.1 2.1
OP_8 512*512*85 75 69 58 53 41 43 42 34 5.9 2.4
OP_9 512*512*92 82 71 59 55 43 52 45 43 6.1 2.9
Average 74.1 65 54 48.8 37.7 41.7 37.3 31.1 4.96 2.31

(S: Seeding; T: Tracing; RE: Radius Estimation; SR: Surface Reconstruction; The best values are highlighted with bold letters)