Table 5.
Comparisons in the efficiency of neuron tracing
| Data sets | Size | SEF-OCS (s) | NCT (s) | APP (s) | APP2 (s) | DF (s) | TM (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP_1 | 512*512*60 | 1.1 | 191.5 | 5.3 | 0.6 | 9.2 | 163.5 |
| OP_2 | 512*512*88 | 1.5 | 237.1 | 9.0 | 0.9 | 17.1 | 251 |
| OP_3 | 512*512*62 | 1.2 | 178.3 | 14.0 | 0.6 | 10.5 | 165.7 |
| OP_4 | 512*512*67 | 1.4 | 165.2 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 13.7 | 177.6 |
| OP_5 | 512*512*76 | 1.7 | 233.5 | 28.5 | 0.6 | 15 | 201.2 |
| OP_6 | 512*512*101 | 1.9 | 277.6 | 7.6 | 0.7 | 20 | 255.6 |
| OP_7 | 512*512*71 | 1.4 | 136.7 | 16.4 | 0.6 | 14.3 | 182.1 |
| OP_8 | 512*512*85 | 1.5 | 175.9 | 36.4 | 0.7 | 16.7 | 231.1 |
| OP_9 | 512*512*92 | 2 | 256.3 | 7.8 | 0.7 | 17.9 | 245.5 |
| NC_1 | 512*512*60 | 1.2 | 125.6 | 27.0 | 2.3 | 19.8 | 152.3 |
| NC_2 | 512*512*33 | 0.5 | 57.6 | 11.7 | 1.0 | 6.7 | 81.2 |
| NC_3 | 512*512*44 | 0.7 | 76.5 | 14.9 | 1.2 | 12.3 | 112.2 |
| NC_4 | 512*512*51 | 1.1 | 91.3 | 21.7 | 2.5 | 13.5 | 131.7 |
| NC_5 | 512*512*50 | 0.9 | 76.9 | 43.1 | 4.6 | 9.1 | 125.6 |
| NC_6 | 512*512*46 | 0.9 | 57.2 | 21.1 | 2.1 | 7.5 | 121.9 |
| Average | 1.27 | 155.8 | 18.01 | 1.32 | 13.55 | 173.21 | |
(The best values are highlighted with bold letters)