Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0140537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140537

Table 3. Detailed representation of BOLD effects and comparison between 32/64 channel EEG.

positive BOLD negative BOLD
Spike topography 32 electrodes Comparison 32/64 64 electrodes 32 electrodes Comparison 32/64 64 electrodes
1 TP right + = +
T right + = +
2 Fp right + = + + = +
3 CP right
F left + = +
4 Fp right + = +
C left + = +
Fp right + = +
5 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
6 C left + = +
TP left + = +
FT left + < +
C left + = +
7 T left
8 Fp right + = +
PO central + = +
9 F left + = +
PO central + = +
TP left + = +
10 F left
TP left + = +
TP right < +
11 FT right + < +
12 FT left + >
Fp left + = +
13 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
14 F left < +
15 FT right + < +
TP left + = +
P rigth
16 Fp central + < +
F right + = +
17 F left
FT left
Summary 18 4 (0/4) 19 7 3 (1/2) 7

C, central; CP, centroparietal; F, frontal; FC, frontocentral; FP, frontoparietal; FT, frontotemporal; n.a., not available; P, parietal; PO, parietooccipital; T, temporal; TP, temporoparietal; +, concordance between BOLD and spike topography; -, no concordance between BOLD and spike topography; <, predominance of the 64-channel-EEG; >, predominance of the 32-channel EEG; = or free field, there was no difference between the 32- and the 64-channel map.