Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;7(10):343–349. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i10.343

Table 1.

Main findings of recent studies exploring the use of magnetic resonance angiography

Ref. Year No. of Pt Contrast Criteria for artery stenosis MRA findings Reference and accuracy
Huber et al[28] 2001 41 Uncleara > 0% as clinically significant 23 significant artery stenosis, 2 vein complications, 4 perfusion defects of the parenchyma DSA; Se: 100%; Sp: 93%-97%
Gufler et al[33] 2008 63 Gd-DTPA < 50%: mild; Artery stenosis: 29 mild, 3 moderate, and 1 severe DSA for severe stenosis, one overestimati-on
50%-70%:moderate;
> 70%:severe
Lanzman et al[34] 2009 20 None (SSFP) ≥ 50% as clinically significant 6 significant artery stenosis DSA; Se: 100%; Sp: 88%
Liu et al[30] 2009 13 None (SSFP) ≥ 50% as clinically significant 1 significant artery stenosis Stenosis confirmed by DSA
Ismaeel et al[31] 2011 30 Uncleara ≥ 50% as clinically significant 15 significant artery stenosis DSA; Se: 93.7%; Sp: 80%
Bashir et al[32] 2013 16 Ferumoxytol Unclear 2 moderate to severe stenosis, 1 occlusion Stenosis and occlusion confirmed by DSA
Hwang et al[1] 2013 144 Gadobutrol < 50%: mild; Artery stenosis: 10 mild, 5 moderate, and 8 severe; 17 renal Severe stenosis confirmed by DSA
50%-70%: moderate; parenchymal infarctions
> 70%: severe
Tang et al[29] 2014 75 None (SLEEK) ≥ 50% as clinically significant 14 artery stenosis (10 significant), other complications such as arteriovenous fistulas and pseudoaneurysms Significant stenosis: DSA; positive predictive value: 91%
a

With contrast, but unclear about the specific name. Pt: Patients; SSFP: Steady-state free precession; SLEEK: Spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses; DSA: Digital subtraction angiography; Se: Sensitivity; Sp: Specificity; MRA: Magnetic resonance angiography.