Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 26;6:1166. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01166

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Two-way hierarchical clustering analyses of the hot springs vs. metagenomes based on relative percentage of gene sequences with matches to different SEED subsystems and KEGG pathways. (A) Clustering of hot springs vs. SEED subsystem functions. Subsystems with a standard deviation greater than 0.1 of the observed values, having at least three samples with ≥0.4% of the total sequences are shown. (B) Clustering of hot springs vs. KEGG pathways. Pathways with a standard deviation greater than 0.1 of the observed values, having at least three samples with ≥0.3% of the total sequences are shown.