Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 17;26(4):303–310. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.303

Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival.

Clinicopathological factor Univariate Multivariate
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
FIGO stage III vs. IV 1.39 0.88-2.19 0.16 1.31 0.81-2.12 0.28
Histologic subtype Serous vs. non-serous 1.05 0.58-1.91 0.84 0.84 0.44-1.62 0.61
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
 No. of cycles ≤4 vs. 5≤ 1.11 0.67-1.84 0.69 1.48 0.85-2.55 0.16
 Regimen Taxane based vs. non-taxane 1.01 0.64-1.59 0.98 1.02 0.61-1.70 0.94
Interval debulking surgery
 Systematic lymphadenectomy Done vs. not done 0.89 0.55-1.45 0.65 1.1 0.64-1.88 0.74
 Excision of other organ(s) Done vs. not done 0.75 0.52-1.08 0.12 0.86 0.56-1.32 0.49
 Ascites cytology Negative vs. positive 1.29 0.88-1.87 0.19 1.21 0.82-1.77 0.33
 Lymph node metastasis No vs. yes 0.89 0.67-1.2 0.44 0.99 0.70-1.41 0.97
 Gross residual lesion No vs. yes 4.03 2.46-6.61 <0.001 4.14 2.39-7.16 <0.001

CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HR, hazard ratio.