Table 1.
Potential intervention activity | Reasons for consideration drawn from formative research | Reasons not included in the PRIME intervention |
---|---|---|
Reinstate/supplement the primary healthcare fund | • Insufficient funds to meet daily health centre costs, including transporting drugs, paying for cleaning services, and purchasing supplies • Health workers request payment for services |
• Bureaucratically and administratively challenging to implement • Opportunity for misappropriation • Unsustainable after the study period |
Fill staffing gaps at health centres in accordance with Ministry of Health guidelines | • Many patients and too few staff • Low motivation of staff due to overburdened workloads • Health centres not fully functional due to insufficient availability of staff • Staff not at recommended levels |
• Bureaucratically and politically challenging to implement • Limited availability of health workers nationwide • Requires substantial funding • Unsustainable after the study period |
Pay/supplement staff salaries | • Health workers not paid on time or in full • Low motivation of staff due to lack of pay • Time spent in alternative employment activities • Health workers request payment for services |
• Bureaucratically and administratively challenging to implement • Not likely to be successful due to national payroll system challenges • Requires substantial funding • Unsustainable after the study period |
Implement ICCM through VHTs | • Community medicine distributors/VHTs important source of care, treatment, and referral in the community • Need to determine a sustainable VHT ICCM programme: community sensitization, training, VHT kits, drug supply, supervision |
• ICCM and VHT policy under revision and implementation timelines uncertain • Potential challenges with the operationalization of the new policy • Required drug formulations for pneumonia not yet available |
Improve the drug supply chain for AL | • Frequent stock-outs of AL and other essential drugs, leading community members to seek care elsewhere • Stock-outs due to challenges with quantification, ordering, storage, district level stock of AL, and numerous logical barriers |
• Other programmes already addressing the drug supply chain • Imminent implementation of new ‘push’ system, potential for misalignment • Unlikely to yield results due to challenges at higher levels of the system |
Work with district and partners to ensure supply of mRDTs and thermometers | • World Health Organization guidelines for malaria case management, but limited supply of mRDTs to health centres • Thermometers not supplied or available in health centres |
• No options for partnering with other stakeholders/partners providing mRDTs and thermometers identified; therefore, they would have to be directly supplied by the PRIME intervention |
Implement community sensitization | • Attract patients to health centres by communicating new/improved services using local councillors, social gatherings, word of mouth, mass media, community dialogues | • It was suggested to focus on word of mouth/VHTs to communicate information; however, the VHT programme was not implemented during the study period |
Include supervision and coaching as part of HCM modules | • Supervision is described by health workers as ‘fault finding, unsupportive and infrequent’, leading to demotivation | • Weak evidence demonstrating effectiveness of supervision • Challenging logistics of implementing supervision activities |
Implement 3-month SOA to complement PCS | • Lack of patient-centred thinking due to low motivation and lack of awareness of how emotions can affect actions and relationships with others | • 3-month activities not aligned with other intervention training packages; therefore revised to weekly activities to fit within four PCS modules |
ICCM=integrated community case management; VHT=village health team; AL=artemether–lumefantrine; mRDT=malaria rapid diagnostic test; HCM=health centre management; PCS=patient-centred services; SOA=self-observation activities.