Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Sep;56(0):25–35. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9730-2

Table 3.

Random-intercept regression models predicting aspects of partnership functioning.

Leadership competence Leadership style Efficiency Directedness Cohesion
Covariate B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE
Youth partnership (vs. adult) .38 .14 .08 .23 –.06 .14 .31 .18 –.16 .13
Other ethnicity (vs. NHW) .10 .11 .12 .12 .13 .11 .06 .12 .23 .09
Female (vs. male) .01 .07 –.04 .07 –.13 .06 .08 .07 –.06 .06
Age .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .00 .01 .00
Years involved .00 .01 .01 .01 .00 .01 .02 .01 .02 .01
% Meetings attended (ref. is < 25%)
    25–50% –.04 .15 –.21 .16 –.14 .16 –.22 .12 –.12 .12
    51–75% –.06 .14 .03 .14 .01 .15 –.04 .11 .05 .12
    76% to 100% .01 .13 .12 .13 –.04 .15 –.09 .12 .07 .11
Time invested per month (ref. is < 1.50 h)
    1.51–4 h .27 .13 .17 .12 .10 .11 .16 .10 .09 .09
    4.01–9 h .26 .15 .25 .14 .08 .12 .16 .11 .04 .10
    ≥ 9.01 h .33 .13 .32 .13 .27 .11 .27 .10 .24 .09
Level of involvement (ref. is 0)
    1 .25 .13 .27 .15 .11 .15 .21 .14 .14 .12
    2 .04 .16 .11 .16 –.01 .16 .12 .15 .06 .13
    3 .25 .16 .44 .17 .01 .17 .27 .16 .15 .15
Participation benefits Participation difficulties Community support Barriers Community improvement
Covariate B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE
Youth partnership (vs. adult) .44 .19 1.21 .19 .45 .25 .17 .20 .18 .16
Other ethnicity (vs. NHW) .17 .11 .12 .13 .15 .08 –.07 .11 .33 .10
Female (vs. male) .10 .06 –.13 .07 –.02 .07 .01 .06 .00 .07
Age .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Years involved .02 .01 .00 .01 .02 .01 –.01 .01 .01 .01
% Meetings attended (ref. is < 25%)
    25–50% –.08 .14 .15 .14 –.01 .14 .01 .11 .01 .13
    51–75% .02 .11 .06 .14 .06 .11 –.02 .12 .01 .12
    76–100% .17 .11 –.06 .11 .01 .12 –.06 .10 .02 .11
Time invested per month (ref. is < 1.50 h)
    1.51–4 h .19 .13 .10 .10 .16 .11 –.13 .09 .15 .11
    4.01–9 h .28 .15 .20 .12 .16 .11 –.03 .09 .16 .12
    > 9.01 h .42 .14 .22 .11 .26 .11 –.25 .10 .25 .12
Level of involvement (ref. is 0)
    1 .27 .18 –.05 .13 .04 .12 –.17 .12 .08 .12
    2 .14 .19 .06 .14 –.07 .15 –.03 .15 –.04 .15
    3 .24 .20 .21 .16 .15 .15 .02 .15 .03 .16

Note: Bolded estimates are statistically significant, p < .05; NHW is Non-Hispanic White.