Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;26(11):2213–2220. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv323

Table 1.

Phase II and phase III studies of selected antigen-specific immunotherapeutic approaches in nonsmall-cell lung cancer

Investigational agent Phase of study N Patients Primary end point Primary end point outcome
Significance of differences between treatment group and control group
Treatment group Control group
Tecemotide Randomized phase II (Butts and Maksymiuk et al. [12]) 171 IIIB or IV NSCLC
SD or OR after first-line chemotherapy or chemoradiation
OS 17.2 m 13 m NS
Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase III (Butts and Socinski et al. [14]) 1513 IIIA (T3, N2 only), IIIB and IV
SD or OR after first-line chemotherapy or chemoradiation
OS 25.6 m 22.3 m NS
Belagenpumatucel-L Randomized, dose-variable phase II (Nemunaitis et al. [7]) 75 II, IIIA, IIIB and IV; low tumor burden
Completed conventional therapy
OS Dose-related improvements in survival in three treatment armsa NA No control arm
Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase III (Giaccone et al. [8]) 532 IIIA (T3, N2 only), IIIB and IV
SD or OR after primary platinum-based chemoradiotherapy
OS 20.3 17.8 NS
Melanoma-associated antigen-A3 vaccine Randomized phase II (Vansteenkiste [15]) 182 Completely resected IB/II MAGE-A3-expressing tumor DFI HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.44–1.20) P = 0.107b NA NS
Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase III (release 2014) 2312 Completely resected IB, II, or IIIA
MAGE-A3-expressing tumor
DFS Not available Not
available
NS

aThree doses (1.25, 2.5 or 5.0 × 107 cells/injection) of belagenpumatucel-L were studied in three cohorts of 25, 26 and 24 patients each.

bHR in favor of the MAGE-A3 group.