Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 19;89(21):10821–10831. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00891-15

TABLE 1.

Frequency of reactivation from latency as influenced by host and virus genotypes

Host genotype Frequency of reactivationa
Reactivation defectb (vCycKO vs WT GHV68)
WT GHV68 vCycKO
C57BL/6J 1/19,588 <1/1,000,000 >51.05
p18−/− × p27+/− 1/5,152 1/26,363 5.12
p18+/− 1/3,198 1/9,908 3.10
p18−/− 1/1,297 1/3,162 2.44
a

Frequency of virus reactivation from latency as measured from peritoneal cells explanted onto MEF monolayers, comparing wild-type and v-cyclin-deficient (vCycKO) GHV68 at day 42 p.i. as calculated from ex vivo reactivation analyses shown in Fig. 1.

b

The fold reactivation defect was calculated as the quotient of the frequency of reactivation for vCycKO divided by the frequency of reactivation for wild-type GHV68.