Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 25;27(4):206–219. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215093

Table 3.

Evaluation of risk of bias in the 22 included studies based on the seven items in the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool

study random sequence generation allocation concealment blinding of participants and providers blinding of outcome assessment incomplete outcome data selective reporting other biasesa overall risk of biasb
Chanpatana 1999[11] Unclear Low Unclear Low Low Unclear Unclear Unclear
Goswami 2003[17] Low Low Low Low Low Unclear Unclear Unclear
Yang 2005[27] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Ding 2007[13] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Cai 2008[10] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Braga 2009[9] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Jiang 2009[18] Low Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Unclear
Zhou 2009[31] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Liu 2010a[21] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Unclear
Liu 2010b[22] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Ding 2011[14] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Unclear
Du 2011[15] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Duo 2011[16] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Jiang 2011[19] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Yang 2011[28] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Unclear
Chen 2012[29] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Wang 2012[32] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Zhang 2012[30] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Chen 2013[12 Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Jiang 2013[20] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Wang 2013[26] Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Petrides 2015[23] Unclear Unclear High Low Low Unclear Unclear High
kappac 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75

a Other biases considered include including study-specific biases or concerns about fraudulent results

b If any of seven items are coded high-risk of bias the overall study is classified as high-risk, if all seven items are coded as low-risk the overall study is classified as low-risk; all other studies (i.e., those with some items coded ‘unclear’ and no items coded as high-risk) are classified as ‘unclear’

c Weighted kappa values for inter-rater reliability of the two independent coders who assessed each item for the 23 studies