Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 13;2015:680769. doi: 10.1155/2015/680769

Table 1.

The classification accuracies of LDA, Z-LDA, and EZ-LDA on simulation dataset.

Training size 20 30 40 50

LDA 78.7 80.4 81.9 83.4

Z-LDA 77.0 81.7 83.0 84.0

EZ-LDA
(different thresholds)
10% 81.2 83.6 84.9 85.8
20% 81.5 83.8 85.1 86.0
30% 81.6 83.9 85.2 86.3
40% 81.6 84.0 85.5 86.4
50% 81.8 84.1 85.5 86.4
60% 81.4 83.9 85.3 86.2
70% 81.3 83.6 85.1 86.2
80% 81.1 83.2 84.8 85.8
90% 80.3 82.8 84.2 85.2

The second column denotes the threshold used in EZ-LDA.

denotes the classification accuracy of EZ-LDA is significantly higher than that of Z-LDA (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05).