Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 15;29(6):789–800. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9668-9

Table 3.

Bland–Altman analysis: the aggregate mean value of the paired values are presented as mean bias, precision, and ±95 % limits of agreement (LOA), which are presented as percent (%) and mL

Mean bias (%) Precision (%) 95 % Limits of agreement
Upper (%) Lower (%) % Error
TBEV SV-1 versus TBEV SV-2 2.87 13.59 +29.51 −23.77
TBEV SV versus cMRI SV −1.56 13.47 +24.85 −27.97
TBEV CO versus cMRI CO 5.01 12.85 +30.20 −20.17
Mean bias (mL) Precision (mL) 95 % Limits of agreement
Upper (mL) Lower (mL) % Error
TBEV SV-1 versus TBEV SV-2 2.05 11.99 +25.55 −21.45
TBEV SV versus cMRI SV −1.53 12.84 +23.64 −26.71 26.2
Mean bias (L min−1) Precision (L min−1) Upper (L min−1) Lower (L min−1)
TBEV CO versus cMRI CO 0.32 0.77 +1.83 −1.19 24.8

Percent error is computed for absolute values of SV and CO. For cardiac output (CO) mean bias, precision, and ±95 % LOA are presented as (%) and L min−1. Note that the mean biases are small and the SD, precision and limits of agreement are similar over the 3 comparisons