Ivanova 2008.
| Clinical features and settings | Inclusion period: n.r. Patient population: 22 patients with histologically proven neuroblastoma at first diagnosis and 22 ¹²³I‐MIBG scans. Consecutive series: yes. Diagnostic work‐up: pathology, blood chemistry, US, abdominal CT or MRI. Time spans symptoms‐index test, symptoms‐reference standard and index test‐reference standard: n.r. Treatment between index test‐reference standard: n.r. |
|
| Participants | Included patients: 22 children with neuroblastoma and a ¹²³I‐MIBG scan at first diagnosis. Median age at diagnosis: 48 months (± 42 months). Sex distribution: 14 boys (64%), 8 girls (36%). INSS stage: n.r. |
|
| Study design | Retrospective cross‐sectional study. | |
| Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target condition: newly diagnosed neuroblastoma. Reference standard: histopathology obtained prior to the index test. |
|
| Index and comparator tests | Assessed primary objective 1.1: to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ¹²³I‐MIBG (SPECT‐CT) scintigraphy for detecting a a neuroblastoma and its metastases at first diagnosis or at recurrence in children from 0 to 18 years old. Index test: ¹²³I‐MIBG scintigraphy. Radiofarmacon: ¹²³I‐MIBG. Dose: 4 MBq/kg. Collimator: n.r. Matrix: n.r. Acquisition protocol: WB scans with or without SPECT. Acquisition time: n.r. Acquisition duration: n.r. Interfering medication: n.r. Thyroid prophylaxis: n.r. A description of a positive test result for ¹²³I‐MIBG scans was not reported. Number and expertise of investigators: n.r. Interobserver concordance: n.r. |
|
| Follow‐up | n.r. | |
| Notes | Data‐extraction performed by a translator. | |
| Table of Methodological Quality | ||
| Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
| Representative spectrum? All tests | Unclear | INSS stage not reported. |
| Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Histopathology. |
| Acceptable delay between tests? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |
| Partial verification avoided? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |
| Differential verification avoided? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |
| Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Index test was not a part of the reference test. |
| Reference standard results blinded? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |
| Index test results blinded? All tests | Unclear | Histopathology obtained prior to Index test. |
| Relevant clinical information? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |
| Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |
| Withdrawals explained? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |
| Selection criteria clearly described? All tests | No | In‐ and exclusion criteria n.r. |
| Sufficient detail for replication index test? All tests | No | Eexecution of the index test n.r. |
| Sufficient detail for replication reference test? All tests | No | n.r. |
| Clear definition of positive result index test? All tests | No | n.r. |
| Interobserver variation reported and acceptable? All tests | Unclear | n.r. |