Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Phys Lett. 2015 Oct 16;639:157–160. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.09.005

Table 3.

Experimental A-U and I•U NN comparison and computational A-U and I•U NN comparison.

Experimental Computational
NN ΔG°3717
(kcal/mol)
Rank NN ΔG°377
(kcal/mol)
Rank NN Etotal1
(kcal/mol)
Rank NN Etotal
(kcal/mol)
Rank
5’GC3’
3’AU5’
−2.35 1 5’GC3’
3’IU5’
−1.34 1 5’GC3’
3’AU5’
−20.19 4 5’GC3’
3’IU5’
−13.73 2
5’AU3’
3’GC5’
−2.08 4 5’IU3’
3’GC5’
−1.22 2 5’AU3’
3’GC5’
−23.10 2 5’IU3’
3’GC5’
−11.58 3
5’AU3’
3’CG5’
−2.24 2 5’IU3’
3’CC5’
−1.03 3 5’AU3’
3’CG5’
−23.12 1 5’IU3’
3’CG5’
−20.12 1
5’CG3’
3’AU5’
−2.11 3 5’CG3’
3’IU5’
−0.77 4 5’CG3’
3’AU5’
−21.52 3 5’CG3’
3’IU5’
−11.35 4
5’AU3’
3’UA5’
−1.10 6 5’IU3’
3’UA5’
−0.50 5 5’AU3’
3’UA5’
−10.59 5 5’IU3’
3’UA5’
−7.82 6
5’AU3’
3’AU5’
−0.93 7.5 5’AU3’
3’IU5’
−0.41 6 5’AU3’
3’AU5’
−7.68 6.5 5’AU3’
3’IU5’
−3.82 7
5’UA3’
3’AU5’
−1.33 5 5’UA3’
3’IU5’
−0.37 7 5’UA3’
3’AU5’
−4.78 8 5’UA3’
3’IU5’
−3.15 8
5’AU3’
3’AU5’
−0.93 7.5 5’IU3’
3’AU5’
−0.43 8 5’AU3’
3’AU5’
−7.68 6.5 5’IU3’
3’AU5’
−8.55 5
MADa 1.1 0.9
a

Mean absolute deviation between experimental NN pairs for A-U and I•U and between computational NN pairs for A-U and I•U