Table 3.
Experimental A-U and I•U NN comparison and computational A-U and I•U NN comparison.
| Experimental | Computational | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NN | ΔG°3717 (kcal/mol) |
Rank | NN | ΔG°377 (kcal/mol) |
Rank | NN | Etotal1 (kcal/mol) |
Rank | NN | Etotal (kcal/mol) |
Rank |
| 5’GC3’ 3’AU5’ |
−2.35 | 1 | 5’GC3’ 3’IU5’ |
−1.34 | 1 | 5’GC3’ 3’AU5’ |
−20.19 | 4 | 5’GC3’ 3’IU5’ |
−13.73 | 2 |
| 5’AU3’ 3’GC5’ |
−2.08 | 4 | 5’IU3’ 3’GC5’ |
−1.22 | 2 | 5’AU3’ 3’GC5’ |
−23.10 | 2 | 5’IU3’ 3’GC5’ |
−11.58 | 3 |
| 5’AU3’ 3’CG5’ |
−2.24 | 2 | 5’IU3’ 3’CC5’ |
−1.03 | 3 | 5’AU3’ 3’CG5’ |
−23.12 | 1 | 5’IU3’ 3’CG5’ |
−20.12 | 1 |
| 5’CG3’ 3’AU5’ |
−2.11 | 3 | 5’CG3’ 3’IU5’ |
−0.77 | 4 | 5’CG3’ 3’AU5’ |
−21.52 | 3 | 5’CG3’ 3’IU5’ |
−11.35 | 4 |
| 5’AU3’ 3’UA5’ |
−1.10 | 6 | 5’IU3’ 3’UA5’ |
−0.50 | 5 | 5’AU3’ 3’UA5’ |
−10.59 | 5 | 5’IU3’ 3’UA5’ |
−7.82 | 6 |
| 5’AU3’ 3’AU5’ |
−0.93 | 7.5 | 5’AU3’ 3’IU5’ |
−0.41 | 6 | 5’AU3’ 3’AU5’ |
−7.68 | 6.5 | 5’AU3’ 3’IU5’ |
−3.82 | 7 |
| 5’UA3’ 3’AU5’ |
−1.33 | 5 | 5’UA3’ 3’IU5’ |
−0.37 | 7 | 5’UA3’ 3’AU5’ |
−4.78 | 8 | 5’UA3’ 3’IU5’ |
−3.15 | 8 |
| 5’AU3’ 3’AU5’ |
−0.93 | 7.5 | 5’IU3’ 3’AU5’ |
−0.43 | 8 | 5’AU3’ 3’AU5’ |
−7.68 | 6.5 | 5’IU3’ 3’AU5’ |
−8.55 | 5 |
| MADa | 1.1 | 0.9 | |||||||||
Mean absolute deviation between experimental NN pairs for A-U and I•U and between computational NN pairs for A-U and I•U