Table 3.
Ct values | Fold increase (2^ΔΔCt) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | LPS | recAP | recAP + LPS | Control | LPS | recAP | recAP + LPS | |
A1 | 28.9 [28.4–30.6] | 29.5 [29.3–30.1] | 28.9 [28.1–29.8] | 29.6 [28.9–29.9] | 1 ± 0 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
A2A | 31.5 [30.6–33.0] | 29.2 [29.0–30.4] | 32.1 [31.4–32.8] | 30.1 [29.4–30.3] | 1 ± 0 | 4.1 ± 0.4# | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.2#, * |
A2B | 27.9 [27.1–29.3] | 27.9 [27.7–28.8] | 28.2 [27.6–29.2] | 28.6 [27.7–28.7] | 1 ± 0 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
A3 | 36.3 [35.9–36.8] | 35.9 [35.4–36.7] | 36.9 [36.3–37.8] | 36.8 [35.7–38.1] | 1 ± 0 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, and median [25th percentile, 75th percentile], depending on the distribution of each parameter. Significant differences of the fold increase were estimated using one‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni post‐test. n = 5.
P < 0.05 compared with placebo
P < 0.05 compared with LPS.