Table 2. Demographic and environmental characteristics of households of pediatric shigellosis patients and of community controls, rural Bangladesh .
Characteristic | No. (%) or median ± SD (range) |
p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Patient households, n = 27 | Control households, n = 27 | ||
Demographic* | |||
Age of child, patient or control† | |||
0–11 mo | 3 (11) | 3 (11) | 1.00 |
12–23 mo | 11 (41) | 11 (41) | |
24–35 mo | 6 (22) | 6 (22) | |
36–47 mo | 6 (22) | 6 (22) | |
48–59 mo | 1 (4) | 1 (4) | |
Female sex, patient or control† | 13 (48) | 13 (48) | |
Primary caregiver educational level‡ | |||
No formal education | 2 (7) | 4 (15) | 0.48 |
Less than primary school | 2 (7) | 3 (11) | |
Completed primary school or greater | 23 (86) | 20 (74) | |
Electricity in home* |
20 (74) |
19 (70) |
0.75 |
Environmental | |||
Main source of drinking water* | |||
Shallow tube well | 16 (59) | 16 (59) | 1.00 |
Deep tube well | 11 (41) | 11 (41) | |
Households with water source Shigella positive by PCR for ipaH gene* | 0 | 2 (7) | 0.48 |
Households with stored water Shigella positive by culture* | 2 (7) | 0 | 0.48 |
Households with stored water Shigella positive by PCR* | 2 (7) | 1 (4) | 1.00 |
Households with no soap observed at any surveillance visit*§ | 18 (67) | 19 (70) | 0.75 |
Floor type* | |||
Earth | 18 (67) | 23 (85) | 0.13 |
Concrete | 9 (33) | 4 (15) | |
Latrine type‡ | |||
Ventilated improved pit latrine | 14 (52) | 12 (44) | 0.49 |
Pour flush toilet | 6 (22) | 6 (22) | |
Traditional pit latrine | 6 (22) | 8 (30) | |
No facility | 1 (4) | 1 (4) | |
Latrine area weekly fly counts¶ | 27 ± 20 (0–84) | 16 ± 13 (0–48) | 0.0014 |
Kitchen area weekly fly counts¶ | 59 ± 55 (0–216) | 44 ± 48 (0–192) | 0.47 |
*McNemar test was used for paired categorical variables. †All patient–control pairs were the same. ‡Friedman test was used for paired categorical variables with >2 levels. §Soap within 10 steps of location reported to be used for household defecation. ¶Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for paired continuous variables.