Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 15;3(9):2325967115603654. doi: 10.1177/2325967115603654

Table 2.

Comparison of Measurement Items in the Injury and Noninjury Groupsa

Injury Group (n = 16) Noninjury Group (n = 257) P Valueb
Height, cm 172.2 ± 4.9 171.7 ± 11.3 .83
Body weight, kg 66.1 ± 4.1 64.7 ± 6.4 .24
BMI, kg/m2 22.3 ± 1.8 22.8 ± 12.6 .18
Foot–arch height ratio, % 17.4 ± 2.0 17.7 ± 2.1 .53
Toe-grip strength, kg 16.7 ± 1.8 18.0 ± 2.4 .01
Q-angle, deg 13.9 ± 2.0 15.1 ± 2.3 .07
Leg-heel angle, deg 6.4 ± 2.2 7.1 ± 1.9 .28
Functional reach test, cm 45.9 ± 2.5 44.7 ± 5.0 .18
Single-leg standing time with eyes closed, s 90.5 ± 22.6 97.0 ± 18.7 .28
SLR angle, deg 90.3 ± 6.4 88.8 ± 7.7 .54
FFD, cm 7.1 ± 8.0 8.4 ± 6.6 .64
HBD, cm 0.2 ± 0.8 0.1 ± 0.6 .87
Ankle dorsiflexion, deg 19.1 ± 3.8 19.5 ± 4.2 .80
Ankle plantar flexion, deg 39.1 ± 4.6 39.7 ± 4.2 .44
Generalized joint laxity test, score 0.6 ± 1.1 0.5 ± 1.0 .97

aResults are reported as mean ± SD. BMI, body mass index; FFD, finger-floor distance; HBD, heel-buttock distance; Q-angle, quadriceps angle; SLR angle, straight-leg raising angle.

bMann-Whitney U test. Comparison between the injury and noninjury groups showed that the toe-grip strength was significantly lower in participants who sustained a fracture (P < .05). The Q-angle also tended to be lower in those who had sustained a fracture (P < .07). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any other items assessed.